Calculus is always done in radian measure. Degree (a right angle is 90 degrees) and gradian measure (a right angle is 100 grads) have their uses. Outside of the calculus they may be easier to use than radians. However, they are somewhat arbitrary. Why 90 or 100 for a right angles? Why not 10 or 217?

Radians make it possible to relate a linear measure and an angle measure. A unit circle is a circle whose radius is one unit. The one unit radius is the same as one unit along the circumference. Wrap a number line counterclockwise around a unit circle starting with zero at (1, 0). The length of the arc subtended by the central angle becomes the radian measure of the angle.

This keeps all the important numbers like the sine and cosine of the central angle, on the same scale. When you graph *y* = sin(*x*) one unit in the x-direction is the same as one unit in the *y*-direction. When graphing using degrees, the vertical scale must be stretched a lot to even see that the graph goes up and down. Try graphing on a calculator *y* = sin(*x*) in degree mode in a square window and you will see what I mean.

But the utility of radian measure is even more obvious in calculus. To develop the derivative of the sine function you first work with this inequality (At the request of a reader I have added an explanation of this inequality at the end of the post):

From this inequality you determine that

The middle term of the inequality is the area of a sector of a unit circle with central angles of radians. If you work in degrees, this sector’s area is and you will find that .

This limit is used to find the derivative of the sin(*x*). Thus, with *x* in degrees, . This means that with the derivative or antiderivative of any trigonometric function that is there getting in the way.

Who needs that?

Do your calculus in radians.

Revision December 7, 2014: The inequality above is derived this way. Consider the unit circle shown below.

1. The central angle is and the coordinates of *A* are .

Then the area of triangle OAB is

2. The area of sector . The sector’s area is larger than the area of triangle OAB.

3. By similar triangles .

Then the area of This is larger than the area of the sector, which establishes the inequality above.

Multiply the inequality by and take the reciprocal to obtain .

Finally, take the limit of these expression as and the limit is established by the squeeze theorem.

The limit of (Sin x)/x as x goes to 0 is still 1 even if degrees are used. You just get the extra pi/180 factor in the numerator and denominator and they cancel. This is easily seen by using L’Hospital’s rule.

LikeLike

I don’t think so. By using (pi/180*x) in both the numerator and denominator you’ve changed the problem to radians and, yes, the limit is then 1. BUT you’ve changed the problem; it’s not the one you started with. With x in degrees d/dx(sin x) = (pi/180)cos(x) but the derivative of x is still 1, so the limit as x goes to 0 of sin(x)/x is (pi/180). You can verify this by Putting your grapher in DEGREE MODE and graphing. Zoom in and you will see the limit is pi/180 or about 0.017

Look at the proof of d/dx(sin(x)) which is done in radians. If instead you use x in degrees you will see the factor of pi/180 in the part of the proof where the sector area formula (in degrees) is used.

Another approach is to graph sin(x) and x separately. Look at the graph near the origin in radians and you will see the graphs are on top of each other and the y-coordinates are nearly the same; hence their ratio is 1 (as is the ratio of their slopes as per L’Hospital’s rule). If you then graph in degrees you will see the graphs and their slopes are quite different.

HTH

LikeLike

Pingback: Why Radians? – Musings of a maths teacher

Reblogged this on The Maths Mann.

LikeLike

Reblogged this on mrreja and commented:

হুম

LikeLike

Lin,can you explain how d(sinx)/dx where x in degree is 180(cosx)/pi

LikeLike

Sathasivam

It is not 180(cosx)/pi, rather pi*cos(x)/180.

1. If x is in degrees, then to differentiate a trig function you must change the degrees to radians. So with x in degrees with the argument now in radians. Then differentiate or returning the argument to degrees.

2. If you wanted to work entirely in degrees from the start, then the middle term of the inequality in the post would be using the formula for arc length with in degrees. Then the will work its way through the inequalities resulting in and from there into the derivative formulas.

3. Try graphing with x in degrees and your calculator set to degree mode. In a square window (that is, with equal units on both axes) the graph will appear to be very flat – almost linear. Thus, you would expect the slopes (derivatives) to be much smaller than when working in radians. The factor takes care of that “flattening.”

LikeLike

Pingback: What are Radians? Where Do They Come From? - Quirky Science

Could you do this same example with Cos (x) instead of Sin (x)?

LikeLike

Is this what you mean? With

xin degrees you must change the argument to radians and then differentiate using the Chain Rule:This works the same way with any trig function.

LikeLike

That is want I meant. I just wanted to make sure that the pi/180 would stay constant throughout and the chain rule would then be applicable. Thanks!

LikeLike

Hi Lin,

I like the way you have explained for easy understanding. However, please expalain (or give reference) of the inequality you have used for the explanation.

LikeLike

Hi Ranjay

I have added an explanation of the inequality at the end of the post. Thanks for writing; you were probably not the only one who was wondering about this.

LikeLike

Yes, if one were to use anything other than radian measure than one would get constants popping up upon differentiating trig functions and once they appeared these constants would mestasize. For the same reason one uses e as exponential base rather than the seemly more simple choice of say 10. Differentiating 10^x and the constant ln(10) appears. This must be nipped in the bud.

In elementary geometry where one is not using calculus the use of degrees or grads is perfectly OK.

LikeLike

The radian is a linear measure of an angle, and it works best if you have your delta x and delta y in the same units. Degrees are a made up unit. Try plotting a sine wave using radians vs degrees for the x-axis. The y-axis will be the amplitude. A linear measurement. I’m sure more could be said but this might get your foot in the door.

Bill Retired math/physics teacher

LikeLike

Hi Lin,

Small typo – “a unit circles is a circle…”

Love your stuff!

Steve

LikeLike

Thanks. I fixed it. Glad you like the blog.

LikeLike