February 2015

 Calculus Teacher Makes the Big Times

Yitang Zhang

Photo by Peter Bohler – The New Yorker, February 2, 2015

Before turning to this month’s posts, I thought you might be interested in this. There is an interesting profile of Yitang Zhang in this week’s The New Yorker magazine by Alex Wilkinson. Mr. Zhang is a mathematician whose interest is “bound gaps” a problem in number theory on prime numbers. He is a part-time calculus teacher at the University of New Hampshire. He has won several prizes including a MacArthur award.

The profile is entitled The Pursuit if Beauty.

Wilkinson also made a short video explaining the “bound gaps” problem.


February

This month our previous posts finish a series on accumulation started in January and includes notes on power series. I have a few new post planned for February. Towards of the end of the month I plan to post a list of the previous posts on reviewing for the AP exams. As usual the four posts directly below are the most popular from previous Februarys. The most popular by a factor of about 50 (really) is the one on Error Bounds followed by iPads.

As always, please feel free to comment, question, or ask questions. I can use some suggestions about what you would like me to write about. My email address is lnmcmullin@aol.com. Notice, I’m a natural logarithm.

Thanks in advance.

Posts from past Februarys

February 2, 2013: Accumulation and Differential Equations Accumulation 6: Differential equations 

February 4, 2013: Painting a Point Accumulation 7: An application (of paint) 

February 8, 2013: Introducing Power Series 1

February 11, 2013: Introducing Power Series 2

February 13, 2013: Introducing Power Series 3

February 15, 2013 New Series from Old 1

February 18, 2013: New Series from Old 2

February 20, 2013: New Series from Old 3

February 22, 2013: Error Bounds

February 17, 2014  iPads

January

Happy New Year!

The January posts from past years finish the methods of integration thread from December and then go onto applications of integration: area between graphs, volume, and average value of a function. The month ends with a series on accumulation and functions defined by integrals.These run into February, so I’ve included them in the list below.

The most popular post from past Januarys by far is the AP Accumulation Question post. It is in the featured list below along with some others from past Januarys.

Later this month look for a new series of post on differential equations

January 2, 2013 Integration by Parts – 1

January 4, 2013 Integration by Parts – 2

January 7, 2013 Area Between Curves

January 9, 2013 Volume of Solids with Regular Cross-sections

January 11, 2013 Volumes of Revolution

January 14, 2013 Why You Never Need Cylindrical Shells

January 16, 2013 Average Value of a Function

January 19, 2013 Most Triangles are Obtuse! What is the probability that a triangle picked at random will be acute? An average value problem.

January 21, 2103 Accumulation: Need an Amount? Accumulation 1: If you need an amount, look around for a rate to integrate.

January 23, 2013 AP Accumulation Questions Accumulation 2: AP Exam Rate/Accumulation Questions

January 25, 2014 Improper Integrals and Proper Areas

January 26, 2013 Graphing with Accumulation 1 Accumulation 3: Graphing Ideas in Accumulation – Increasing and decreasing

January 28, 2013 Graphing with Accumulation: Accumulation 4: Graphing Ideas in Accumulation – Concavity

January 30, 2013 Stamp Out Slope-intercept Form! Accumulation 5: Lines

February 2, 2013: Accumulation and Differential Equations Accumulation 6: Differential equations

February 4, 2013: Painting a Point Accumulation 7: An application (of paint)

December

Which are you looking forward to more: winter vacation or teaching Riemann sums and the FTC? Well okay, vacation; me too – except that being retired is like vacation almost every day. Anyway, before vacation or certainly right after comes Riemann sums and the Fundamental Theorem, one of my favorite parts of the curriculum.

This is the list of past posts for December. There are a few new ones in the works for this year. The lead up to integration starts with three activities to get students started on integration ideas: “The Old Pump” , “Flying Into Integrationland.” and “Jobs, Jobs, Jobs.” The next four are the “featured post” below the first post on the home page; they form a series leading up to the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. (The blog lists them automatically in most-recent-first order so I cannot change the order. Start with “Working Towards Riemann Sums” and read backwards.) Don’t skip the post “More on the FTC.”

Happy Holidays!

December: Introducing Integration, Riemann Sums, the Definite Integral, the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, properties of integrals

November 30, 2012 The Old Pump

December 3, 2012 Flying Into Integration Land

December 5, 2012 Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

December 7, 2012 Under is a Long Way Down

December 10, 2012 Working Towards Riemann Sums

December 12, 2012 Riemann Sums

December 14, 2012 The Definition of the Definite Integral

December 17, 2012 The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

December 19, 2012 More about the FTC

December 21, 2012 Properties of Integrals

An extra post more related to derivative applications:December 8, 2012 Inequalities

November

November – deep into derivatives. This month’s featured posts from past Novembers are below. “Speed,” which discusses various ways to approach this topic, seems to be one of the most popular with close to 2600 hits since it was first posted in 2012. This is followed by “Open cor Closed” which discusses a question that almost always comes up at workshop and online: should the interval where a function is increasing or decreasing by open or closed. The next two most popular are “Motion Problems” one of the several posts on inverses.

When I began this blog I was posting about three times per week. I have the whole of first-year calculus to write about. I hope I’ve hit the main points. If there is anything you would like me to add or expand on, or any topic or problem you think others might be interested in please let me know; I can use some ideas.

I did get a request this week to update my Guide to AP Calculus (AB & BC) Free-response Questions. (I meant to do this, but totally forgot about it.) This guide gives suggestions on what is asked on the various common free-response questions. I’ve expanded this in my posts on reviewing for the exam (check the “Thru the Year” tab under January and February). The Guide also list the question number and individual notes on individual questions from 1998 through 2014. The Guide is on the Resource page or you can click the link at the beginning of this paragraph.

Graphing, Inverses, Linear Motion, Introducing Integration

November 2, 2012 Open or Closed?

November 5, 2012 Inverses

November 7, 2012 Writing Inverses

November 9, 2012 Writing Inverses

November 12, 2012 The Calculus of Inverses

November 14, 2012 Inverses Graphically and Numerically

November 16, 2012 Motion Problems: Same Thing, Different Context.

November 19, 2012 Speed

November 21, 2012 Derivatives of Exponential Functions

November 26, 2012 Integration Itinerary

November 18, 2012 Antidifferentiation

November 30, 2012 The Old Pump

October

4328070_orig

School is underway and I hope things have settled down for you. You may need a little break, so I suggest you give the Calculus Humor website a look. You‘ll find some humorous things there such as the graph at the top of this post. As the name suggests they are all based on calculus.

Use the “Thru the Year” tab at the top for links to past October posts. This month has posts on the Mean Value Theorem, finding derivatives from tables and graphs, related rate problems and graphing.

The four featured posts directly below this one are the most read from past Octobers. The leader was “Reading the Derivative’s Graph” with over 6,000 hits. This was followed by “Why Radians?” with almost 3,000 hits. The two posts on Related Rates were next with an average of about 500 each.

September

Hope you all had a nice Labor Days weekend: for some a welcome day off after the first week or two of school, for others the last day of summer and back to school this week.

The four featured post below are the most popular from the August – September period.

As you know I have organized things by months and have tried to stay ahead of you so that if you find something new and useful you will have time to incorporated into you plans. If you are just starting use the August page under the “Thru the Year” tab above. If you’ve already started then look at the September guide.

Here is a series of .gifs that my son sent me that you might like Math Gifs

FoxTrot show workRevised September 1, 2014.

 

Calculators

First some history and then an opinion

I remember buying my first electronic calculator in the late 1960s. It did addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, and could remember one number. It displayed 8 digits and had a special button that displayed the next eight digits. I remember using those next eight digits never. To buy it I had to drive 40 minutes and spend $70 – expensive even today.

The square root of 743 computed using the algorithm discussed in the post. The third iteration (fourth answer) is correct to 10 digits.

The square root of 743 computed using the algorithm discussed in the post. The third iteration (fourth answer) is correct to 10 digits.

With it I learned an iterative algorithm for finding square roots: guess the root, divide the guess into the number, average the quotient and the guess, repeat using the average as the new guess.  You could do it all without writing anything down. (See the illustration on a modern calculator – accurate to 8 decimals in only 3 iterations (fourth answer), but then I could find the next 8 with the special button.)

Since then, I’ve had lots of calculators of all sorts.

Graphing calculators hit the general market around 1989 or 1990. This was the same time as the “reform calculus” movement. The College Board announced that the AP calculus exams would require graphing calculators in 1995 – five years to get the country ready.

The College Board held intensive training immediately following the reading. These were the TICAP conferences (Technology Intensive Calculus for Advanced Placement). Half the readers were invited for the first year and the other half for the second, then more for the third year.

Casio, Hewlett-Packard, Texas Instruments all gave participants calculators to use take home. Sharpe lent them calculators (and we haven’t heard of Sharpe since). Sample lessons were taught using Hewlett-Packard CAS calculators and then the same lesson was taught using TI-81s. The HP computer algebra system calculators, with far more features but using the far more complicated reverse Polish notation entry system, lost in the completion to the simpler to use, but less sophisticated TI-81s.

The teachers were not all happy. A friend of mine, due to retire in 2-3 years gave up his AP calculus classes early so he would not need to learn the calculators. Others embraced technology. The AP program forced the graphing calculator into high schools where they were used to improve learning and instruction. Yet even today not all high schools have embraced technology.

The calculator makers, especially Texas Instruments, provided print materials, software, workshops and conferences that helped teachers learn how to use graphing calculators in their classes at all levels.

Technology, as a way to teach, learn, and most importantly, do mathematics, caught on big time. And that was and is a good thing.

I think graphing calculators are very quickly becoming obsolete and should be phased out.

Technology has bypassed graphing calculators. Tablet computers, PCs, Macs, iPads, and the like, even smart phones, can do everything graphing calculators can do. They are more versatile. The larger screens are easier to see and can show more information without crowding.

The initial investment may be more than for a graphing calculator, but once purchased the apps are relatively cheap. There are many free apps that not only do computations and graphing, but CAS operations as well. Interactive geometry and statistics apps are also available.

These, along with online textbooks and internet access, put everything students need to learn math literally at their fingertips. Graphs and other results can be easily copied and printed, or pasted into note-taking apps.

One disadvantage is the initial cost for the hardware (but of course many students already have the hardware). The other disadvantage is the ability to communicate and find help both in the room and around the world during tests. Photographing the questions for later use by others is another concern.  I think (hope) it is just a matter of time before this problem can be overcome perhaps with an app that allows access only to the apps the teachers allow for tests.

Technology, like time, marches on.