**Good Question 14 – The Integral Test**

I have no criteria for what constitutes a “Good Question” for this series of occasional posts. They are just questions that I found interesting, or that seem more than usually instructive, or that I learn something from. I cannot quote this question (2016 BC 92) since it is on a secure exam. What made it interesting is that to answer it students pretty much needed to know the proof of the Integral Test and the figures that go with it.

I recall only one AP question from many years ago that asked students to “prove” something – usually students are asked to show that a result was true by citing the theorem that applied and showing the hypotheses were met. The directions are often “justify your answer.”

Doing an original proof is not, in my opinion, a fair question and proving some known theorem is just a matter of memorization. For these reasons, students are not asked to prove things on the exams. So, should you prove things in class? Probably, yes.

Here is the usual proof of the integral test. Afterwards I’ll discuss the question from the exam.

**The Integral Test**

Hypotheses: Let be a function that is positive, decreasing, and continuous for ; and let for

In the first drawing the rectangles have a height of *a _{n}* and a width of 1. The area is of each is

*a*, and the sum of their areas the series is .

_{n}__Part 1__: Notice that Assume that the improper integral diverges.

__Conclusion 1__: If the improper integral diverges, then the series diverges.__Conclusion 2__: (The contrapositive of conclusion 1) If the series converges, then the improper integral converges.

__Part 2__: In the second drawing below, assume that the improper integral converges. The sum of the areas of the rectangles is . (NB: this series starts at *n* = 2.) Since is less than the convergent improper integral it will also converge. Adding to this gives the original series, ; this series also converges.

__Conclusion 3__: If the improper integral converges, then the series converges.__Conclusion 4__: (The contrapositive of conclusion 3) If the series diverges, then the improper integral diverges.

Putting the four conclusions together is the **Integral Test**: If the hypotheses above are met, then the series and the improper integral will both converge, or both diverge.

To answer the multiple-choice question (2106 BC 92) on the exams students were told that the improper integral converges. Therefore, the associated series converges. They then had to determine whether the series or the improper integral has the greater value. Stop here and see if you can figure that out.

Return to the first figure above, only this time assume that the improper integral and the series converge. It is pretty obvious that .

So, even though students were not asked to prove anything, a familiarity with the proof and its figures is necessary to answer the question. That’s why I liked it,

On the other hand, it is kind of an obscure point and I’m not sure it has any practical value.

Why couldn’t you refer to your second figure, saying that because the improper integral converged, then the series converged, and therefore the integral > series? It sounds like the question was worded this way. Is it because the first term is omitted from the series in your second figure?

LikeLike

Yes, it is because in the second figure the first rectangle on the left is , so the entire series is not shown. The rectangle for extends to the left between

x= 1 and the y-axis. You cannot tell (for sure) from this that the series is greater than the integral. From the first figure (with the new assumption that the series and integral both converge) you can see that the area representing the series is greater than the area represented by the integral.LikeLike